Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

Post re: Latin America: Its Lexical Origins (Joe Listo, Brazil)
Created by John Eipper on 10/31/06 1:39 PM - re-latin-america-its-lexical-origins-joe-listo-brazil

Previous posts in this discussion:


re: Latin America: Its Lexical Origins (Joe Listo, Brazil) (John Eipper, USA, 10/31/06 1:39 pm)

Joe Listo writes:

As much as I respect Mendo Castro Henriques's position (31 October), I
disagree that South America is a geopolitical unit, and that [Brazilian
presidential candidate] Alckmin represented "the North American motivation to destroy MercoSul." South America can be seen as a
geographical unit but hardly a geopolitical one. Individual interests are
infinitely far apart, and (with the welcome exception of Chile) Venezuela,
Brazil and Bolivia are under grossly populist, corrupt and inexperienced
Former Brazilian president Fernando H. Cardoso supported MercoSul and the failures and successes of the program varied according with its members' own financial problems. Alckmin, who is affiliated with the same party as Fernando Henrique, participated in various presidential debates during the campaign and re-inforced his intentions of strengthening MercoSul.
If NAFTA represented an opportunity, as Fernando Henrique put it, it was
ill-examined during his administration, and totally discarded by Lula for
cheap political reasons. Lula criticizes NAFTA with the well-trod argument
that the US just wants to take advantage of the rest of the world. If this is true, then the countries who want to do business
with the US (I would risk a guess and say about 100% of the planet) must
pass legislation to regulate the exchange of trade in a way that it is
profitable to both sides. Brazil was sacked by Evo Morales (with the
blessing of Hugo Ch vez) when he took over US$1.5 billion in Petrobras's
assets in Bolivia.
The Lula administration applauded the act, stating that "Bolivia is a country that suffered way too much and it is time we give something back".
What about Lula's country, where 45% of the population live below the
line of poverty? I wonder what the reaction would be if the US seized any
foreign property. I hear and read a huge amount of criticism towards the
Bush Administration, but I am very sure his main goal is to protect US
Practically all private foreign businesses are successful in Latin America
because they are managed in a capable manner. The problem starts when governments (i.e., political agendas) are involved.

For information about the World Association of International Studies
(WAIS), and its online publication, the World Affairs Report, read its
homepage by simply double-clicking on: http://wais.stanford.edu/

John Eipper, Editor-in-Chief, Adrian College, MI 49221 USA

Rate this post
Informational value 
Reader Ratings (0)
Informational value0%

Visits: 5


Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now

All Forums with Published Content (46051 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications


Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy


Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series


Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust


Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire


Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 Violence War War Crimes Within the US


Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)


Geography Maps Tourism Transportation


1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who