Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

PAX, LUX ET VERITAS SINCE 1965
Post Chinese Progress?
Created by John Eipper on 12/28/14 4:25 PM

Previous posts in this discussion:

Post

Chinese Progress? (Tor Guimaraes, USA, 12/28/14 4:25 pm)

Richard Hancock (27 December) shared with us some interesting thoughts: "We sometimes believe that China is a juggernaut which is rapidly going to surpass the US as the world's No. 1 superpower, [but] in my opinion, China is about in the same phase as the US was in 1932 when FDR was elected president and began his New Deal that gave workers social security, unemployment compensation, and set wage and production standards for industry."

I agree with Richard's comment that "as workers achieve a better standard of living, it will be more difficult for China to continue ignoring Roosevelt's Four Freedoms enunciated in a speech before Congress on January 6, 1941--freedom of speech and religion, freedom from want and fear." In fact, many very well-informed people believe that maintaining social harmony when large segments of the Chinese population experience economic/financial benefits at significantly different rates is the most serious challenge to the Party's rule.

Contrary to what Richard opined, comparing China today with the US in 1932 is an impossible task, given the large number of variables which must be considered. Nevertheless, based on my own social, political, and economic estimations, for how long must the present trends in their favor and against us continue for China to clearly overtake us as "the world's No. 1 superpower" depends on what both sides do. To me, it will all be about what both sides do to their respective middle classes. If Mr. Magnier of the WSJ is correct in saying that "the ground is shifting in favor of workers, ... forcing companies to offer better conditions. Wages for migrant workers have increased at double-digit rates since 2010, reaching 2,609 yuan ($423) a month last year," and the US government continues to allow its middle class to get weakened (watering down Roosevelt's Four Freedoms), then China will overtake the US sooner rather than later.

On the other hand, if the Chinese government mimics the US government in the last few decades and allows the Chinese middle class to stagnate to the benefit of corporate/elite profits, then China may never surpass the US.

JE comments:  Also, there is the factor of China pricing itself out of the labor market.  Isn't cheap labor the only real advantage China enjoys at present?  Even cheaper nations (Vietnam comes to mind) are eager and willing--and there is the "race to the bottom" in the US, which is making this nation's manufacturing more competitive.


SHARE:
Rate this post
Informational value 
Insight 
Fairness 
Reader Ratings (1)
87%
Informational value100%
Insight80%
Fairness80%

Visits: 10

Comments/Replies

Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now



All Forums with Published Content (45694 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications

Economics

Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy

Education

Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series

History

Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust

Nations

Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire

Politics

Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 Violence War War Crimes Within the US

Religion

Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)

Travel

Geography Maps Tourism Transportation

WAIS

1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who