Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

Post Homophobia in Christianity and Islam
Created by John Eipper on 03/30/14 7:13 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:


Homophobia in Christianity and Islam (Massoud Malek, USA, 03/30/14 7:13 am)

While commenting John Heelen's post of 29 March, JE wrote:

"Certainly Saudi Arabia, with its barbaric anti-sodomy laws (thousands of lashes or even execution), is far more homophobic than Putin's Russia, and the US never raises a protest to the House of Saud."

Should Americans force other people to follow their newly found liberal standards--standards not shared by everyone? Should we consider the Roman emperor Nero who married three men, more sympathetic than Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin? Finally, are Christians more tolerant about homosexuality than Muslims?

O​n 24 December 2013, Alan Turing, a computer pioneer and a codebreaker during the Second World War,​ who​ undoubtedly shortened the conflict and saved thousands of lives, was given a posthumous royal pardon.

In 1952, four years after Britain abolished flogging, Alan Turing was convicted under the "Criminal Law Amendment Act of 1885," for gross indecency following which he was chemically castrated. The procedure lasted one year of hormone injection and may have caused his early death.

Today we consider castrating a man for having sex with another consenting man, a barbaric act. Ask any man, if he prefers castration or receiving at most 100 lashes. I assure you that the answer is lashes.

Today's Saudi Arabia, an absolute monarchy controlled by the Al-Saud ruling tribe and a leading US ally in the Middle East, is very different from the time of the prophet Muhammad. Fourteen centuries ago, the prophet told his followers that if you penetrate a boy, then you may not marry his mother; but if you only play with the boy, then there is no objection by Allah to marrying his mother. He also wrote in Koran, if a man rapes another man, then he should be punished with lashes; but after the punishment, if he stops raping other men, then he should be forgiven. There is no mention of consenting men having sex in the Koran.

Twelve centuries, after Muhammad, in Christian Britain, the "Offenses Against the Person Act of 1861," raised the age of consent from 10 to 12. It also made unlawful carnal knowledge of a girl under the age of 10. In addition, the 1861 Act had made the penalty for indecent assault or attempted rape of a girl below the consensual age two years' imprisonment. There was no mention of penalty for raping of an older girls.

Sufi poets in medieval Arab lands and in Persia wrote odes to the beautiful wine boys who served them in the taverns. The great Persian poet, Hafez (d. 1389), in his most famous poem, offered Samarkand and Bukhara in exchange for the love of the Turkish boy with a beauty mark.

Unlike the Muslim world, the Renaissance saw intense oppression of homosexual relationships by the Roman Catholic Church. In France, first-offender sodomites lost their testicles, second offenders lost their penis, and third offenders were burned. Women caught in same-sex acts could be mutilated and executed as well.

In Islam, lashes for punishment are not supposed to leave permanent scars, and when the number of lashes is high (maximum of 100 and not 1000, as JE wrote), are frequently done in batches to minimize risk of harm.

During the Napoleonic Wars, the maximum number of lashes that could be inflicted on soldiers in the British Army reached 1,200. Two centuries later, inflicting someone with 1,200 lashes is considered barbaric.

Today, medically supervised caning is routinely ordered by the courts as a penalty for some categories of crime in former British colonies, such as: Singapore, Brunei, Malaysia, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, and elsewhere.

JE comments: One of the central quandaries faced by anyone who studies different cultures: is the intolerance of intolerance itself an act of intolerance?  This same question could also apply to female genital mutilation, widows on funeral pyres, the caste system, etc.

I fail to see how lashes can ever be made humane, whether they come in batches of hundreds or thousands. See this entry in WikiIslam, which mentions punishments of up to 7000 lashes for homosexual acts: http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Persecution_of_Homosexuals_(Saudi_Arabia)

I don't use the word "barbaric" lightly, but it applies to this aspect of the Saudi legal code.  Granted, I have the same opinion of capital punishment in general, no matter how "humane."  One of the things that makes me proudest about Michigan is that there has been no capital punishment here since 1846.

Rate this post
Informational value 
Reader Ratings (2)
Informational value80%

Visits: 78


Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now

All Forums with Published Content (45692 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications


Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy


Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series


Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust


Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire


Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 Violence War War Crimes Within the US


Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)


Geography Maps Tourism Transportation


1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who