Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

PAX, LUX ET VERITAS SINCE 1965
Post Generals Andrey Vlasov and Mikhail Tukhachevsky
Created by John Eipper on 10/01/13 8:16 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:

Post

Generals Andrey Vlasov and Mikhail Tukhachevsky (Luciano Dondero, Italy, 10/01/13 8:16 am)

In response to Eugenio Battaglia (27 September), General Vlasov was definitely not a "Trotskyist" in any meaningful sense of the word. His "Prague Manifesto" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prague_Manifesto ) states an explicit opposition to Bolshevism. That, besides the assertion that an alliance with Hitler was needed to defeat Stalin, is clearly beyond the pale for anybody connected in any way, shape or form with Leon Trotsky--whose followers dubbed themselves "Bolshevik-Leninists."

That Vlasov's aims were different from Hitler's is certain (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrey_Vlasov for the history and evolution of this conflict), and his Russian Liberation Army at the end of the war sided with Czech Communist partisans to liberate Prague from the Nazis; then Vlasov escaped to the West and tried to sell himself to the US/British. However, unlike real Nazis (such as spymaster Gehlen and V2 Werner von Braun), whom the US happily took on board, Vlasov was handed back to the USSR, where a year later, he was sentenced to death and hanged.

There had been another, famous Soviet general, who could have been regarded in some ways as a Trotskyist, Mikhail Tukhachevsky, who was shot by Stalin in 1937. A long-standing opponent of Stalin (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tukhachevsky ), Tukhachevsky had long argued for an aggressive military policy, like the use of parachutists to drop on cities where a workers' uprising would take place, to further the cause of the revolution. Ironically and tragically, because of the intense collaboration between the Red Army and the Wehrmacht in the 1920s, the notion of a blitzkrieg was adopted by the German High Command, and was later used successfully both in Western and Eastern Europe, including against the Red Army itself.

"Tukha" had been a close collaborator of Trotsky since 1919, when Trotsky took upon himself the task of organising a Red Army capable of defending Soviet Russia against the Whites and foreign troops.

JE comments:  So the use of paratroopers was a Soviet invention?  Never a day goes by that I don't learn something from WAIS!



SHARE:
Rate this post
Informational value 
Insight 
Fairness 
Reader Ratings (0)
0%
Informational value0%
Insight0%
Fairness0%

Visits: 127

Comments/Replies

Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

  • Tukhachevsky and De Gaulle (Nigel Jones, UK 10/01/13 12:35 PM)
    In response to Luciano Dondero (1 October), one aspect of Tukhachevsky's life that escaped the Wikipedia biography is that during the First World War he shared his German PoW camp with Charles de Gaulle. Since both were later proponents of armoured warfare, one wonders whether this subject came up when they talked behind the wire.



    The savage treatment meted out to Tukhachevsky's family by Stalin (his wife and brothers shot; his daughter sent to the Gulag and only released in the Khrushchev thaw) backs up what I have always thought: when it comes to psychopathic savagery, the pock-marked, web-toed little Georgian leaves Adolf Hitler in the learner class.

    JE comments: Tukhachevsky and de Gaulle: there's a film to made here.  I wonder if Tukhachevsky knew French?  Of course, in a Hollywood rendition they would both speak accented English.



    Please login/register to reply or comment:

    • Tukhachevsky and De Gaulle (Cameron Sawyer, Russia 06/26/14 3:45 AM)

      Back on 1 October 2013, John E asked if Mikhail Nikolayevich Tukhachevsky knew French. He apparently spoke both both French and German pretty well. He came from a family of the minor Russian nobility, who typically knew French, and often German, as well as English. It has been recorded that Second Lieutenant Tukhachevsky and Captain De Gaulle were friends, and that De Gaulle inspired Tukhachevsky to improve his French. The friends met in Paris in 1936, and when De Gaulle visited Soviet Russia in 1966, De Gaulle asked to visit Tukhachevsky's surviving relatives (the request was refused). Whether they talked about the doctrine of "glubokaya operatsiya" ("deep battle") or not, I don't know--I haven't seen anything in the sources.



      The interesting Wikipedia article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Tukhachevsky#cite_note-5 ) states that De Gaulle and Tukhachevsky were cellmates; I have not found this fact, however, in any of the Russian sources.



      Tukhachevsky was undoubtedly a brilliant military mind, the loss of which was a tragic loss to the Soviet Army in its struggle against Hitler. This is one of those banal commonplaces which happen to correspond to reality. It is strange to imagine that such louts as Voroshilov and Budenny were the peers of such a figure in the same army. And the exceptionally poor generalship of these two ignoramuses is what just about lost the war in the first six months, as Von Bock and Kesselring closed in on Moscow and came within a hair of decapitating the Soviet Union; if Tukhachevsky had been in command it is really realistic to imagine that the outcome would have been very different.



      Tukhchevsky is one of the main symbols, in Russia today and in fact in the Soviet Union from the time of his rehabilitation in in the early 1960s, of the barbaric repressions of 1937. Khrushev proposed to erect a statue to him in Red Square; this did not take place, but there was a Soviet postage stamp dedicated to him in the early 1960s. There are streets named after Tukhachevsky in Moscow and many other Russian cities.



      It's little known in the West, I think, but Tukhachevsky's long-time mistress, Natalia Sats, whose relationship was not concealed by them, is the patriarch (matriarch?) of the genre of children's musical theater. She founded the Moscow Children's Musical Theater (prototype of hundreds of such theaters around Russia, with at least a dozen just in Moscow), and commissioned Peter and the Wolf from Sergei Prokoviev, who was a close friend of Tukhachevsky. Every child in America has heard Peter and the Wolf, but this is in fact just one of a whole genre of children's operas of which there are hundreds or thousands of works, seen by Russian children.


      JE comments:  The WAIS effect strikes again:  today the topic is generals on stamps.  I hadn't read Cameron Sawyer's post prior to publishing the US 32-center depicting Stand Watie (see Richard Hancock, 26 June).  So in the interest of fairness, here's Gen. T in '63.  That gorgeous aqua is so typical of the decade.  My '64 Chevy Corvair is almost the same color:





      The Wikipedia article mentions Tukhachevsky's virulent anti-Semitism.  Is this remembered in Russia today?


      Please login/register to reply or comment:

      • Was Tukhachevsky Anti-Semitic? Natalia Sats (Cameron Sawyer, Russia 06/27/14 4:15 AM)
        When commenting my post of 26 June, JE wrote: "The Wikipedia article mentions Tukhachevsky's virulent anti-Semitism. Is this remembered in Russia today?"

        I could find no facts in the Russian sources which show that Tukhachevsky was an anti-Semite. His long-time mistress and apparently love of his life, Natalia Sats, was a Jew, although I guess that doesn't necessarily prove anything.


        Tukhachevksy is a Polish family name, and I did read some speculation in Russian historical forums that because he was or might have been an ethnic Pole, he might have been an anti-Semite. I don't know why Russians assume that all Poles are anti-Semitic; this stereotype does not follow logically from the fact that anti-Semitism was more prevalent and more virulent in Poland and Ukraine, than in Russia.


        One thing much discussed in the Russian sources is Tukhachevsky's cruelty during the Civil War. He apparently used poison gas against peasants resisting the Bol'shevik land collectivization, and was generally quite ruthless, even by Bol'shevik standards. I guess it's not unknown or even unusual for military geniuses to have been cruel, as much as we might like to believe otherwise; Robert E. Lee may not have been representative. Another good reason not to romanticize war.


        JE comments:  Wikipedia gets the anti-Semitic claim from De Gaulle himself, or specifically from Jonathan Fenby's book The General: Charles De Gaulle and the France He Saved (2012).  Fenby is a prolific historian, and I presume a reputable one.  Has anyone read his biography on De Gaulle?


        Natalia Sats died in recent times, 1993, at the age of 90.  She was a witness to the entirety of Soviet history, and saw much of it up close.  Her father, composer Ilya Sats, was a protege and friend of Tolstoy, and after Tukhachevsky was purged in 1937, she spent five years in a labor camp.  I'd like to know more about this intriguing person.


        Please login/register to reply or comment:

        • Was Tukhachevsky Anti-Semitic? (Leo Goldberger, USA 06/28/14 4:50 AM)
          Re: Cameron Sawyer's post of 27 June. According to the sources quoted below, Tukhachevsky was indeed a virulent anti-Semite:

          http://espressostalinist.com/2013/10/17/mikhail-tukhachevsky-on-communists-and-the-jews/


          JE comments: The above was published on the Espresso Stalinist (espressostalinist.com). I had no idea such a website existed; wouldn't Uncle Joe have preferred tea?  Nevertheless, the Tukhachevsky quotes come from legitimate published sources.  Besides the aforementioned Jonathan Fenby biography, there is a quote from French journalist Rémy Roure, who attributes the following statement to Tukhachevsky, apparently revealed to De Gaulle in the historic prison cell:  "The Jews brought us Christianity.  That's reason enough to hate them."

          Please login/register to reply or comment:

          • Tukhachevsky and Anti-Semitism (Cameron Sawyer, Russia 06/28/14 9:10 AM)

            These sources for alleged anti-Semitism of Tukhchevsky are all the same, going back to alleged second-hand or third-hand statements of De Gaulle. I would bet dollars to doughnuts that the Fenby quotes also come from the same French journalist. (See Leo Goldberger's post of 28 June.)



            It is not really relevant, but other pages on Tukhchevsky in the "Espresso Stalinist" attempt to show that the trumped-up charges upon which he was murdered by Stalin were true--that he was a German agent, that he was plotting to overthrow Soviet power, etc. Like JE, I was surprised that such things exist, but perhaps it is a joke.



            I am not saying whether Tukhachevsky was or was not an anti-Semite; I don't think we know. I have not found any convincing sources one way or the other. I don't think the words of one French journalist are very convincing. I think it is somewhat unlikely that a person who was in love with a Jew all his life, and didn't conceal it, was a "virulent anti-Semite," but I don't think it's impossible.



            That Tukhachevsky was a convinced Bol'shevik and Communist is well established, contrary to the charges lodged at Tukhachevsky's show trial, and contrary to what is written in the "Espresso Stalinist."  Ironically, it is this which gives many Russians today some misgivings about Tukhachevsky as a hero of the nation.


            JE comments:  I've had the Espresso Stalinist website on my mind all morning, together with thoughts of Gavrilo Princip, who 100 years ago today changed the world forever with a tiny .32 Browning pistol. 


            An interesting historical tidbit:  Princip nearly survived the war, dying in a Habsburg jail of tuberculosis in April 1918.



            It's been a strange morning.

            Please login/register to reply or comment:

            • Jonathan Fenby's De Gaulle Biography (Nigel Jones, UK 06/29/14 4:06 AM)
              John E asks whether anyone has read Jonathan Fenby's biography of De Gaulle, The General: Charles De Gaulle and the France He Saved. I have--and several other lives of the General too. Fenby (who I know) is indeed a reputable journalist turned historian. Briefly editor of the liberal UK Sunday newspaper The Observer, he then edited the Hong Kong-based South China Morning Post. As a result, he has two strings to his historical bow: books about France and books about China.

              With regards to Tukhachevasky, most biogs of De Gaulle confirm that the two men first met when prisoners of war in WWI. (De Gaulle was taken prisoner at Douaumont during the bloody battle of Verdun). Presumably it was then that they discussed their common interest in the burgeoning art of armoured warfare.


              As Cameron Sawyer remarks, Tukhachevsky was himself no shrinking violet when it came to inflicting brutal violence. He used such methods against both the Whites in the Civil War and the Red sailors during the repression of the Kronstadt uprising.


              The detail that sticks in my mind regarding the purge of Tukhachevsky by Stalin is that the historians Donald Rayfield in Stalin's Hangmen and Simon Sebag Montefiore in Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar report that Tukhachevsky was badly tortured after his arrest in May 1937 and forced into confessing to being a German spy as part of the purge of the Red Army's High Command, and that, in Montefiore's words, "Tukhachevsky's confession, which survives in the archives, is dappled with a brown spray that was found to be blood spattered by a body in motion." Ironically, given Tukhachevsky's reputed anti-Semitism, the two NKVD torturers who worked on him, Izrail Leplevsky and Zinoviev Ushakov, were both Jewish. Ushakov himself was later purged and shot.


              I'd like to hear Cameron's views on whether the Red Army purge was just another instance of Stalin's paranoia, or whether it was orchestrated from afar by Reinhard Heydrich's Nazi secret service, the SD. Or both.


              JE comments: I'd like to know more about the "Nazis behind Stalin's Red Army purge" thesis. It sounds far-fetched to me, although I'm just an amateur on WWII. As Nigel Jones suggests, Stalin's paranoia never needed outside encouragement.

              Please login/register to reply or comment:

              • Did Nazi Intelligence Provoke Stalin's Purge of the Red Army? (Cameron Sawyer, Russia 07/15/18 4:10 AM)
                Nigel Jones wrote on June 29th, 2014: "I'd like to hear Cameron's views on whether the Red Army purge was just another instance of Stalin's paranoia, or whether it was orchestrated from afar by Reinhard Heydrich's Nazi secret service, the SD. Or both."

                Sorry for the late (4 years!) reply to this.


                There is some evidence that the Germans fabricated evidence that Tukhachevsky (and seven other Red Army generals) was disloyal, in the hopes of stimulating Stalin to purge him, in order to weaken the Red Army leadership. If this actually happened and actually influenced Stalin, then this German operation must be judged a brilliant success, as the Red Army was virtually decapitated in 1937, which had profound effects on the early stages of Barbarossa.


                Here is an excellent article in English on the very subject: http://www.tracesofevil.com/1999/06/to-what-extent-was-german-involvement.html


                Although the article is based only on secondary sources and only on English language sources, what is written here is an excellent synthesis of everything plausible which I have read in the Russian and German sources. The short version is that Stalin, like many dictators, indeed like many bullies, suffered from deep insecurity, and was terrified to the point of paranoia of anyone who might be considered a rival. Tukhachevsky (like Trotsky) was talented, popular and arrogant (a "potential Napoleon", as one writer called him) and ran into conflict with Stalin from an early stage, already during the Civil War if not earlier. I think that it is pretty clear that Stalin had been looking for an excuse to get rid of Tukhachevsky for a long time. I don't think we can know for sure whether he seriously believed the documents of the "Benesh Dossier" (as Russian historians call it), but it probably doesn't really matter. No such documents were used in Tukhachevsky's trial; the blood-spattered confession referred to by Nigel was all that was judged necessary, and that itself was a mere formality.


                The "Benesh Dossier" was a set of documents supposedly handed over to the Soviets by the then-president of Czechoslovakia in 1937 incriminating Tukhachevsky and others.


                My own opinion is that all this had little to do with the Red Army purges, which were an entirely logical and integral part of Stalin's orgy of slaughter which had its peak in 1937, which started with real enemies, progressed to imagined enemies, and finally dealt with random victims. Stalin used to say "net cheloveka, net problem"--hard to translate the tone of that exactly, but it means something like--"no guy, no problem", or "if there simply isn't that person, then there also isn't the problem." Tukhachevsky could not have survived 1937 in any case; he must have been at the top of the very first lists for liquidation.


                In Russia, these events are referred to simply as "1937."


                JE comments:  Here's the link to Nigel's 2014 WAIS post, which appeared in the context of a lengthy discussion on Tukhachevsky.  Wikipedia reports that De Gaulle and Tukhachevsky were cellmates as POWs during WWI, but the sources for this are not definitive.


                https://waisworld.org/go.jsp?id=02a&l=en&objectType=post&o=86232&objectTypeId=74019&topicId=165


                Please login/register to reply or comment:



            • Tukhachevsky Again; Remy Roure (Leo Goldberger, USA 06/30/14 6:55 AM)
              While I quite agree that the issue of anti-Semitism in the context of this thread is quite peripheral (see Cameron Sawyer, 28 June), I find it difficult to see why the distinguished French journalist Rémy Roure's testimony of De Gaulle's conversation with his fellow prisoner Tukhachevsky is simply dismissed.

              It was found reliable enough to be quoted in Jonathan Fenby's book on De Gaulle. The quote originally derives from Roure's own book, Le Chef de L'Armée Rouge, Paris: 1928.


              What is it about Rémy Roure that makes him a questionable source? Just curious...


              JE comments:  Good points.  A parallel question would be to ask why Roure would fabricate these anecdotes about Tukhachevsky's anti-Semitism.  Especially, because in the 1920s Bolshevism was often viewed by the Right as a "Jewish" ideology.

              Please login/register to reply or comment:

              • Tukhachevsky and Roure (Cameron Sawyer, Russia 07/01/14 3:27 AM)
                In response to Leo Goldberger (30 June), I do not "dismiss" the accusations by one journalist of second or third-hand anti-Semitic statements by Tukhachevsky, which started out in this conversation as one journalist quoting another journalist's book. I simply classify them for what they are:  second- or third-hand statements by one journalist, not supported by any other single source which I have been able to find. As I said, Tukhachevsky may or may not have been an anti-Semite, but I find the evidence presented so far to be exceedingly thin. Maybe there are some other sources, but I haven't uncovered any.

                JE asks why any of these would "fabricate" quotes--well, when a quote has been through so many hands as in this case, no one needs to fabricate anything. Maybe De Gaulle misunderstood or misremembered what he heard. Maybe De Gaulle was really talking about someone else, and the first person to quote him got it mixed up. Maybe it was really De Gaulle making such statements. My legal training taught me to regard hearsay, especially double- or triple hearsay, with a lot of caution. And besides that, as a lover of history, I regard single isolated sources with caution. So here the caution should be squared or cubed.

                Please login/register to reply or comment:

                • Tukhachevsky and Sats (Leo Goldberger, USA 07/02/14 6:00 AM)
                  I stand corrected, Cameron Sawyer (1 July): I should not have used the term "dismissed," and I much appreciate your care in researching the history surrounding Tukhachevsky. Accepting hearsay evidence or reliance on a single source without further fact-checking is clearly an unacceptable practice, whether in law or in good academic scholarship.

                  A case in point, vi-à-vis our recent focus on Natalia Sats, is the surprising assertion by the prominent historian Robert Conquest that she had been married to Tukhachevsky (see The Great Terror: A Reassessment, p. 306), without so much as a source reference. Several others mention her as having been his long-time love and mistress. My own research led me to the claim she was married to USSR People's Commissar of Internal Trade, A. Ya. Veytser (they were both arrested in 1937; he was executed and she sent to Rybinsk Prison camp for some 5 years). I also learned that Tukhachevsky was a notorious womanizer, had many mistresses and only met Natalia Sats shortly before his arrest and that he had wished to divorce his third wife, Nina Grinevich. But this did not come to pass.


                  While these are inconsequential details in the larger scheme of things--such as the motivation behind Stalin's brutal purge in 1937 and Tukhachevsky's subsequent "rehabilitation" by Khrushchev and his contemporary elevated stature, but one is still bothered by the inconsistency in rendering even facts that ought to be above the level of speculation.


                  Perhaps reading Sats's two-volume memoirs (Sketches From My Life) which I intend to do, might be revealing. Based on several accounts I have come across on the Internet, she was a most remarkable woman, remembered for her strong character and refusal to buckle under Soviet repression--not to mention her multi-faceted role in the musical world and especially in the creation of musical theater for children everywhere.


                  JE comments: Has a definitive biography of Tukhachevsky ever appeared? (I should say "definitive" in quotation marks, since no such biography has ever appeared for anybody.)


                  As I've pointed out before, Robert Conquest is historically a WAISer (http://waisworld.org/go.jsp?id=02a&objectType=post&o=64582&objectTypeId=58832&topicId=123 ), although he hasn't been on our mailing list during my tenure as editor.  He is now 96 years old.  In March in the Hoover Archives, I came across a videotaped Ronald Hilton interview with Prof. Conquest, but unfortunately I didn't have the chance to watch it.

                  Please login/register to reply or comment:









Trending Now



All Forums with Published Content (41758 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications

Economics

Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy

Education

Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series

History

Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust

Nations

Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire

Politics

Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 Violence War War Crimes Within the US

Religion

Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)

Travel

Geography Maps Tourism Transportation

WAIS

1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who