Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

Post re: Economic Sanctions and Diplomacy (Tim Brown, US)
Created by John Eipper on 04/26/10 5:47 PM - re-economic-sanctions-and-diplomacy-tim-brown-us

Previous posts in this discussion:


re: Economic Sanctions and Diplomacy (Tim Brown, US) (John Eipper, USA, 04/26/10 5:47 pm)

Bienvenido Macario wrote on 26 April: I'd like to ask Tim Brown if he could give us the different stages of negotiations and diplomacy leading to a peaceful resolution typical of an international crisis or heaven forbid an armed conflict. Tim Brown responds: An example in which, for good reason, I do not name the protagonists. Two Latin American countries had been trying via confidential negotiations for many years to find a peaceful resolution to competing claims to several tiny, uninhabited islands that might have very valuable natural resources in their adjacent waters. Then one day word of these negotiations leaked. This vaulted the matter out of the shadows of diplomacy and into the glaring lights of the public political arena. At that point it became a matter of nationalistic pride, not private discussion, as jingoists on both sides began saying with ever-increasing passion that "we must never cede a single a precious inch of our sacred soil to anyone. We must defend it to the death." As public passions increased, the governments on both sides felt more and more under pressure to act until finally one started to mobilize its armed forces, at which point the other began to do the same. Then military units began to move towards each other's border as third parties, including the US, desperately scrambled to find a way to defuse the situation. Hopes for this continued and arguments that in fact neither country wanted to go to war so there wouldn't be one evaporated when they started moving body bags up to the front. Now a matter of national pride, neither government felt it could back down without being overthrown for doing so until, at the very last minute, a solution was found. Although neither country wanted war, neither could back down to the other nor to a third party such as the US or even UN in the face of threats from the other. But both could, and did, back down to a third party with sufficient moral authority to let them do so without losing face--the Pope. The lesson is clear, at least to me.

Rate this post
Informational value 
Reader Ratings (0)
Informational value0%

Visits: 4


Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now

All Forums with Published Content (42835 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications


Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy


Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series


Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust


Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire


Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 Violence War War Crimes Within the US


Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)


Geography Maps Tourism Transportation


1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who