Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

Post Yom Kippur and Scapegoats; from Gary Moore
Created by John Eipper on 10/08/19 9:07 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:


Yom Kippur and Scapegoats; from Gary Moore (John Eipper, USA, 10/08/19 9:07 am)

Gary Moore writes:

JE has asked, in a sense, why I don't think William Tyndale (burned at the stake in 1536) should be blamed for giving us the word "scapegoat" through his mis-translation of the Bible.

Angering a then-beleaguered Church by producing the first Bible in English that worked directly from the old texts, Tyndale's 1530 translation also left a less-understood byproduct--which fits with this Tuesday, the beginning of the Yom Kippur holy day.

This is because Tyndale's translation rendered Leviticus 16:8 as "one lotte for the Lorde, and another for a scapegoote." Trials notwithstanding, the result came down to the King James Version in 1611 as: "one lot for the Lord, and the other lot for the scapegoat." "Scape" was then a familiar short form of "escape," but Tyndale pulled his "escape-goat" from the Hebrew word לַעֲזָאזֵֽל --which doesn't say "goat" at all.

The ages have agonized about what that Hebrew word really does say --this lone place in all the Bible that speaks of לַעֲזָאזֵֽל (la-‘ă-zā-zêl, or Azazel). But the link to Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement) is clear. To expiate the collective sins of Israel, the passage says, two goats were picked, but only one was sacrificed, hence the drawing of lots. The goat that drew the luckier lot was not ritually slain, but was led out into the wilderness to roam free, carrying Israel's sins with it.

In ritual newer than Leviticus, the practice evolved into throwing the second goat off a cliff, less luckily. But in the Old Testament the goat definitely escapes ("let him goo fre in to the wildernesse") (or as the KJV puts it:" let him go for a scapegoat into the wilderness").

Tyndale seems not to be to blame here, though, because the Church's own Vulgate had long been translating לַעֲזָאזֵֽל (the mystery word Azazel) as "caper emissarius"--Latin for "emissary goat." Yet in some modern translations this disappears, and, cryptically, we get the word itself, "Azazel." (English Standard Version: "one lot for the Lord and the other lot for Azazel.") It's thrown in with the English text amid a discreet lack of explanation.

To make a long story short, Leviticus never directly says (though the apocryphal Book of Enoch did) that Azazel is an evil spirit. He roams the wilderness, out on the fringes of the known, in this case waiting to receive his goat. The passage balances his name against Yahweh's as the two receivers. For over a millennium of Christian translations--from not only Tyndale but the Church that urged his burning, and from Martin Luther, no papist--there were intricate contortions over the original telegraphic Hebrew symbols, in order to avoid an iceberg's tip that winks up from the goat. Here was an affront to the bedrock pride of a great universe of Mosaic legacy--not only Jewish and Christian, but Islamic as well--in that it re-interprets the idea of monotheism.

As with the djinni of fiercely monotheistic Islam, and the droves of demons roaming from medieval Catholicism to modern Evangelism and Mormonism, the pesky spoiler Azazel could be read as implying that monotheism, in this universe, is not exactly the apical climax of civilized abstraction by philosophers that we may have thought, but, in a universe still noisily crowded with invisible hobbits, could be looked at as more of a way to say which one of them is boss.

JE comments: An awesome reflection, and most timely for Yom Kippur. A little atonement never hurt anyone, but this animal-lover asks in earnestness: why must goats pay the price? Animal cruelty of all stripes really gets my goat.

I hope our Hebrew and Old Testament scholar Ed Jajko will comment. A side question: what is the proper greeting for Yom Kippur? Certainly not "happy Yom Kippur..."

Gary Moore is scratching the surface of a deep theological question: are the so-called Monotheistic religions genuinely "mono"? I vote no, and cite as another example the pantheon of Christian saints.

Rate this post
Informational value 
Reader Ratings (0)
Informational value0%

Visits: 174


Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

  • Yom Kippur 1982 (Edward Jajko, USA 10/09/19 9:51 AM)
    I'll send a more detailed response to Gary Moore's posting on Yom Kippur and the scapegoat, from which I learned a lot, sometime later when I have a chance, but for now I will note only that for this practicing Roman Catholic, Yom Kippur is a day I sort of keep in my heart.

    It was on Yom Kippur, Monday, September 27, 1982, that I had my job interview at the Hoover Institution Library. A successful day.

    JE comments: Extremely successful, I'd say, Ed. For if you hadn't come to Hoover, you wouldn't have met Ronald Hilton, and may never have become a citizen of WAISworld.

    And I'm on pins and needles for your comment on scapegoats.  Did Gary Moore and I get the Hebrew right?  I was editing on faith alone.

    Please login/register to reply or comment:

Trending Now

All Forums with Published Content (42712 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications


Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy


Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series


Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust


Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire


Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 Violence War War Crimes Within the US


Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)


Geography Maps Tourism Transportation


1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who