Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

PAX, LUX ET VERITAS SINCE 1965
Post Sacco and Vanzetti: The OJ Trial of the 1920s
Created by John Eipper on 08/26/19 2:25 PM

Previous posts in this discussion:

Post

Sacco and Vanzetti: The OJ Trial of the 1920s (David Duggan, USA, 08/26/19 2:25 pm)

The Sacco-Vanzetti case divided the US in more ways than any legal case before OJ Simpson's. It divided the country along immigrant-nativist lines, liberal-conservative lines, and even legal positivist v. legal realist lines. A great account can be found in Gerald Gunther's masterful biography of the Hon. Learned Hand, who risked his friendship with Harvard Law Professor Felix Frankfurter by arguing that the process had been fair, and that "Our dangers do not lie in too little tenderness to the accused. Our procedure has always been haunted by the ghost of the innocent man convicted. It is an unreal dream. What we need to fear is the archaic formalism and the watery sentiment that obstructs, delays, and defeats the prosecution of crime." (LH letter to FF, quoted at p. 391, Gunther, Learned Hand.)

Many years ago, I was defending a former U of Chicago contracting officer in federal court, accused in a kick-back scheme (how novel), and used this vignette in my sentencing argument as to how great legal minds could differ over interpretations as to the application of the law to the facts. The judge, the Hon. James Zagel, one of the luminaries of the Chicago federal bench (he presided over the Blagojevich trial, and numerous organized crime trials in his 30-years on the bench), acknowledged the divide between these luminaries, and then offered that he thought one was guilty and the other innocent of the murder charges tried in a Massachusetts state court (the Hon. Webster Thayer, as New England a name as you can get, presiding). I forget who Judge Zagel thought innocent and who guilty, but Zagel would be as competent a jurist as any to come to the correct conclusion: he had been the back-office legal expert researching the insanity defense during the prosecution of Richard Speck in the late 1960s. Convicted of the murder of eight nurses, Speck was the all-time mass-murder leader until his later Stateville Penitentiary fellow guest, John Wayne Gacy came along 10 years later.

My historical scholarship did my client little good: he still got 48 months for his delicts, which was the precise amount I had predicted.

JE comments:  I would never question a Learned Hand, but isn't "watery sentiment" the cornerstone of US criminal law--innocent until proven guilty and all that?  (Alright, I just questioned His Learnedness.)


SHARE:
Rate this post
Informational value 
Insight 
Fairness 
Reader Ratings (0)
0%
Informational value0%
Insight0%
Fairness0%

Visits: 146

Comments/Replies

Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now



All Forums with Published Content (41968 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications

Economics

Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy

Education

Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series

History

Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust

Nations

Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire

Politics

Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 Violence War War Crimes Within the US

Religion

Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)

Travel

Geography Maps Tourism Transportation

WAIS

1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who