Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

PAX, LUX ET VERITAS SINCE 1965
Post Is BoJo a Populist?
Created by John Eipper on 08/07/19 3:56 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:

Post

Is BoJo a Populist? (José Ignacio Soler, Venezuela, 08/07/19 3:56 am)

I have been interested in the figure of Boris Johnson since he was a media personality, mayor of London, and a political clown of sorts, although he is perhaps more capable and erudite than he appears to be. I was surprised to learn that, because of the British electoral system, he was elected by only 0.2% of the British voters and it seems he has the majority support of the Parliament by only one vote. The democratic character of the British system is admirable, but it is doubtful he will fulfill all his promises, particularly to carry out Brexit successfully.

Anyway, the question that interested me more was whether he is one more of the dangerous and risky populist politicians, so abundant around the world these days, or rather, if he can be a successful leader.

To evaluate this question, I have six criteria of populist politicians often used by me for Chávez, Trump, Evo Morales, and others:

Populists mostly:

1) Emerge from a crisis and collective frustration--economic, political or social. BJ has emerged from a deep crisis in Great Britain: Brexit, an incipient economic recession, some critical social issues and the immigration crisis.

2) They are charismatic leaders with high communication and rhetorical skills and resources, with self-assuredness and confidence of success. Of course, I do not know BJ well, but according to his public behavior he seems to have good rhetorical skills and self confidence, besides ambition for power.

3) They use demagogic language, irreverent--even politically incorrect--radical or "revolutionary" clichés with promises that cannot be fulfilled. In this case, I have no doubt of BJ's demagogy and political incorrectness, but it is perhaps too early to judge the feasibility of his promises.

4) They give a fake sense of empowerment to the otherwise anonymous masses, appealing to very basic collective emotions, such as racism, patriotism or sectarianism of some kind, which attract the uneducated sectors of the population. I have also some doubts on this item, and BJ does not seem to be particularly racist (am I wrong?). However, according to what I saw in his inaugural speech at Parliament, he did use a patriotic and nationalistic cliche à la Trump's "America first. Let's make America great again." In BJ's case it was Great Britain.

5) They show an old, or new, form of Chauvinism (neo-Chauvinism?) blaming of most of the problems on external enemy forces, foreigners, immigrants, other countries or commercial treaties. Johnson does seem to blame the EU as the external enemy of all GB´s problems.

6) A tendency to isolate the country (ethnocentrism) or to divide society between "good" and "bad," as a response to those real or imaginary "enemies." I believe BJ was elected as PM as an enthusiastic Brexiter (to isolate GB from Europe) and as a result, to divide Britain radically between Brexiters and opponents. He might not really be a convinced supporter but needed to show (fake?) enthusiasm for the sake of power ambition and opportunism.

In conclusion, I believe that Johnson appears to be another populist politician. However, in his case he deserves the benefit of the doubt. BJ is well educated, some say erudite but somehow superficial, vain and manipulative. He is more a Liberal than authoritarian and perhaps less nationalistic than protectionist. Still, his reactions are unexpected and difficult to predict.

I ask British WAISers, particularly BJ's sympathizers, to forgive me for expressing publicly my presumptuous opinion in this matter, but sincerely I hope BJ will succeed in his task to accomplish Brexit, for the benefit of Great Britain and Europe.

JE comments: No forgiveness necessary, Nacho! So glad you've set the BoJo Ball rolling on WAIS. We're overdue. Johnson fulfills at least three of your six characteristics for populism, although to his credit he doesn't wallow in "lowest common denominator" politics à la Trump. Nor is he a bully of the Trumpian stripe. BoJo prefers humor over vitriol...or am I blinded by the assumption that any nation is more felicitously led than the US at present?

I hope our UK colleagues will chime in.


SHARE:
Rate this post
Informational value 
Insight 
Fairness 
Reader Ratings (1)
60%
Informational value80%
Insight80%
Fairness20%

Visits: 161

Comments/Replies

Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now



All Forums with Published Content (41958 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications

Economics

Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy

Education

Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series

History

Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust

Nations

Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire

Politics

Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 Violence War War Crimes Within the US

Religion

Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)

Travel

Geography Maps Tourism Transportation

WAIS

1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who