Previous posts in this discussion:
PostNathaniel Bowditch, Navigation Pioneer (Sasha Pack, USA, 07/27/19 4:18 am)
What I don't know about navigation could fill many volumes, so I always enjoy Captain Battaglia's posts on the topic. I particularly appreciated his mention of Nathaniel Bowditch (July 22nd), because my friend and colleague Tamara Thornton recently published a biography of the great mariner and polymath of the Early American Republic.
Tamara reports that it has been a very long time since any of the material in the "Bowditch" was actually written by Nathaniel (is the same true for Hoyle?), but adds that when she published the biography she received letters and phone calls from--and even struck up friendships with--several Coast Guard and Navy folks who revere the man. It turns out that apart from being a great mariner, Bowditch (who died in 1838) was also an innovator in the fields of what we would today call accounting and management.
JE comments: Here's more on Tamara Thornton (University at Buffalo) and her bio of Nathaniel Bowditch. She has also written a history of the lost art of handwriting in America:
Sasha Pack mentions Hoyle. Earlier I asked WAISers to come up with examples of authors who wrote "The Book" on a given topic. Bowditch, Hoyle, Robert are in that elite club of synecdoche writers who stand in for an entire field of knowledge. Who else can we add?
What Makes a Polymath?
(Tor Guimaraes, USA
07/27/19 10:30 AM)
The last post from Sasha Pack (July 27th) mentioned a few polymaths. According to the definition those are people knowledgeable on many subjects. That is what I have strived for all my life and never quite made it. Further, I see some interesting issues with the concept.
For example, one issue arises because knowledge grows exponentially and by necessity becomes increasingly specialized. It therefore becomes increasingly more difficult for anyone to become a polymath.
Another issue arises from the nature of real knowledge which has been accumulated over centuries and keeps being corrected and improved on very specific topics. Thus, a person like Aristotle must be considered one of the greatest and earliest polymath. Yet, much of his knowledge was wrong and debunked by early scientists.
How do we account for these issues before labeling someone a polymath?
JE comments: Is it still possible to be a true polymath? This question has never before appeared on the Forum. (I've nonetheless used the label to describe several WAISers.) Is it sufficient in our age to have expertise in two or three areas? Still in Jefferson's day, it was possible to know everything.
A related question for the WAISitudes: who was the last polymath? Google it, and several votes come up for Bertrand Russell.