Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

PAX, LUX ET VERITAS SINCE 1965
Post Imamoglu Wins Istanbul Mayoral Election
Created by John Eipper on 06/24/19 6:56 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:

Post

Imamoglu Wins Istanbul Mayoral Election (Yusuf Kanli, Turkey, 06/24/19 6:56 am)

The much-anticipated but unexpectedly strong reelection of Ekrem İmamoğlu to the Istanbul metropolitan mayoral seat most probably will be remembered in years ahead as a turning point in the history of Turkish democracy.

The 9.2 percent difference between Mayor-Elect İmamoğlu and the Justice and Development Party (AKP) candidate, former premier and parliament speaker Binali Yıldırım, clearly demonstrated the democratic commitment of the Turkish electorate.

The foremost factor that produced this result was perhaps the grassroots discontent with the ruling coalition and the way the March 31 vote for Istanbul mayor was annulled, while the city council and district mayor votes cast at the same time were considered legally valid.

In the Supreme Electoral Council-annulled elections of March 31st, there was a negligible 13,000 vote difference between the two candidates. The 9.2 percent or almost 800,000-vote difference in the rerun between the winner İmamoğlu and the loser Yıldırım indeed revealed a very strong disapproval of not only the opponents of the AKP and its partners but also of some supporters. This reaction of the electorate might produce some long-term consequences for the AKP, as it might have a reflection on the parliamentary ranks as well.

The second most important factor that affected the election result was the hope that the average Turkish voter, eager for stability, would buy into the systematic alienation and polarization tactics pursued by some government members, who hoped (as in the past) that polarization would work primarily to the advantage of the ruling coalition. The rather arrogant rhetoric regarding the ethnic background of İmamoğlu--of course being Greek cannot be an accusation--reached the extent of calling all Black Sea people "Greek." That hate speech consolidated the Black Sea support for İmamoğlu.

The third equally important factor was the "blame the other" tactic, which at the same time indulged in actions that went even further. İmamoğlu was accused of receiving the support of the pro-Kurdish Peoples' Democracy Party (HDP) and thus of the separatist Kurdistan Workers' Party--that is, implying collaboration with terrorists. He also got a declaration from Abdullah Öcalan--the imprisoned chieftain of the PKK serving a life term at the İmralı island prison--which tacitly called people to vote for Yıldırım or elect Öcalan's former guerrilla brother. "Reminding" people of the reforms undertaken by the AKP for Kurdish rights while blaming the CHPO of never undertaking a reform program just did not work. On the contrary such an action probably served to consolidate civilian leadership of the HDP as well as consolidate the Kurdish support for İmamoğlu.

The Istanbul vote will also have impact on the foreign policy of the country. Turkey exhausted its resources with a "tension with all" mentality which left it with almost with no friends. This foreign policy perspective--or indeed the absence of a disciplined foreign policy--can no longer be sustainable due to the worsening economic situation of the country.

In any country where voter behavior is primarily shaped by the electorate's pocketbook, no one can say that the Turkish electorate is better off on June 23 compared to March 31. Nor can anyone convince the Turks that tomorrow will bring better economic conditions as long as some sort of a moderation is undertaken. The June 23 vote, most probably, is a warning by the electorate to the government that rather than a single-handed governance, the country should move to a more participatory and pluralistic rule.

Lastly, the politics of tension and polarization lost on Sunday, while hope for the future and an urge for tranquility won.

With people embracing democracy so strongly, Turkey has made a new start.

JE comments:  So good to hear from you, Yusuf.  I presume Imamoglu is now the foremost rival and alternative to Erdogan.  What has the Big Man had to say about the Istanbul election?


SHARE:
Rate this post
Informational value 
Insight 
Fairness 
Reader Ratings (0)
0%
Informational value0%
Insight0%
Fairness0%

Visits: 122

Comments/Replies

Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now



All Forums with Published Content (41758 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications

Economics

Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy

Education

Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series

History

Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust

Nations

Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire

Politics

Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 Violence War War Crimes Within the US

Religion

Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)

Travel

Geography Maps Tourism Transportation

WAIS

1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who