Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

Post Amlo: The Next Chavez...or the Next Juarez? (from Gary Moore)
Created by John Eipper on 02/27/19 3:46 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:


Amlo: The Next Chavez...or the Next Juarez? (from Gary Moore) (John Eipper, USA, 02/27/19 3:46 am)

Gary Moore writes:

The logical questions John E asked in his comments on Amlo/pipelines (February 25th) are among the many that, in the press conferences, seem seldom to get asked or answered, with the pronouncements then getting repeated and repeated as holy writ.

Indeed, Amlo is a different kind of president--with lengthy morning press conferences, while his predecessor rarely had even one. But in the above regard it looks much the same: words from the papal throne endorsed reverently as if they were verified, with the questions then disappearing into tomorrow's news cycle.

Who is Amlo? He has carefully avoided the kinds of confrontational rant that made Chávez a lightning rod. By manner as well as deeds, he seems determined to rescue Mexico's culture from...well, from its own cynicism. But there is the deeper question, whispering in faint clues of language that may simply be misconstrued artifacts: No matter how sincere he is, is he completely sane? Is he able to believe the Marxist vision (he repeatedly scoffs at the "neoliberal" past) because... (fill in the blanks)?

I went into this thinking maybe to track a new Chávez, but now grow predictably lost in the dust clouds of Mexican chaos, for which some Amlo rhetoric may be just the inspirational remedy the doctor ordered. Could there be, not a new Chávez, but a new Juárez?

(And no matter how ineffectual he may wind up being against the chaos, with his sermons edging close to The New Man, could it be that Mexico will wind up loving him anyway--for trying? Could it thus rewrite an envisioned victory in memory? As with Juárez. And Cárdenas. Beloved for the effort, which is re-envisioned as victory.)

Much too early for such questions--which can only come when it's much too late. A minefield for the observer. One false step and you wind up either among the deluded cheerleaders or the smug obstructionists, while Mexico's future hangs over the pit.

JE comments:  Among the Chávez-Juárez-Cárdenas trinity, Amlo is probably closest to Cárdenas (obsession with oil, anyone?).  But it's way too early to tell.  Gary Moore makes two Amlo observations that we should use as metrics for the coming 5+ years:  Will Amlo rescue Mexico from its cynicism?  And for this, will he be celebrated...for trying?

Gary first sent this comment to me privately, but I insisted on posting.  Gary, may I appoint you WAISdom's official Amlo-Watcher?  We need one.  There is so much noise today about our most populous neighbor, but precious little careful observation.  And almost zero analysis.

Rate this post
Informational value 
Reader Ratings (0)
Informational value0%

Visits: 131


Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now

All Forums with Published Content (42694 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications


Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy


Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series


Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust


Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire


Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 Violence War War Crimes Within the US


Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)


Geography Maps Tourism Transportation


1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who