Previous posts in this discussion:
PostSupport for Germany's AfD Rises (Eugenio Battaglia, Italy, 01/15/19 10:25 am)
During the last Congress of the AFD (Alternative for Germany), the party requested exit from the so-called European Union and the euro.
The new right-wing party AFD at the 2016 elections had 12.6% of the vote, with peaks of up to 27% in Saxony. Support is now estimated to be at 15%.
Its origin goes back to the arrival of Napoleon in Berlin in 1806 and the resistance by the student brotherhoods (Burschenschaften). It triumphed with the illiberal, national Germany of Otto von Bismarck.
At present we may say that the AFD looks with appreciation to the Nouvelle Droite (New Right) of the great Alain de Benoist and to the ideas of Ernst Nolte.
The AFD comprises various groups, including the anti-Islamic PEGIDA, the groups joined together by the paper Junge Freiheit, etc. But the party is not necessarily neo-Nazi, as one of their heroes seems to be Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg.
It is interesting to note that this revival of Nation and Liberty (Nation-Freheit) was born in the former GDR territories.
As I have always believed the tough, rude (criminal) power of Communism and of the USSR is less efficient than the rather generally soft, besotting power of the American way of life and the Empire.
Anyway until the United Nations cancels articles 53 and 107 from the Charter, now almost 74 years old, there will be no equality and fairness in the world.
Chapter VIII Article 53: The Security Council shall, where appropriate, utilize such regional arrangements or agencies for enforcement action under its authority. But no enforcement action shall be taken under regional agencies without the authorization of the Security Council, with the exception of measures against any enemy state (any state which during WWII has been an enemy of any signatory of the present Charter).
Chapter XVII Article 107: Nothing in the present Charter shall invalidate or preclude action, in relation to any state which during the Second World War has been an enemy of any signatory to the present Charter, taken or authorized as a result of that war by the Governments having responsibility for such action.
Just as the NYT can print fake news that seems the great truth, so any government could find reasons to attack any chartered enemy state. Therefore the latter shall behave and have to obey to the Empire.
JE comments: Eugenio, do you really believe the UN will invade Germany, Italy, or Japan? Still, I see your point: since UN articles were presumably written as insurance against Axis revanchism, it's time to get rid of them.
I've always wondered why the former East Germany is the hotbed of AfD. Is it alienation and economic marginalization--like Trump's "base" in the US?
Czechoslovakia and the Expulsion of the Germans post-WWII
(Paul Pitlick, USA
01/16/19 1:14 PM)
JE's comment to Eugenio Battaglia's post of January 15th brings to mind a question I've been wondering about. It's a simple question, but some background is required.
I'm a dismal historian, but I've spent some time in the Czech Republic the past few years. Some or all of the next statements may be inaccurate, and if you know Central European history, feel free to correct me. My understanding is that the peoples of the land which became known as Czechoslovakia began asserting their identity toward the end of the 19th century as not fitting in with the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and movement toward independence continued into the early 20th century. As a result of WWI, this happened (I was there in October when they celebrated their 100th anniversary as an independent country). When one thinks of that country, two ethnic groups jump out at you, which is why the name was selected, but there were many other ethnic groups, some very small. While the Czechs were the largest group, there were more folks of German descent than there were Slovaks. My sense is that the groups lived fairly well together and there were certainly intermarriages, but their separate identities were somewhat maintained.
Hitler used "discrimination" against the Germans as the reason to invade, but my sense is that was more made-up than real (an alternative explanation advanced by a Czech friend was that Hitler wanted the Czech industrial base for his war machine). We all know how the war went, and at the end, given the events of the years 1938-1945, the Czechs and Slovaks felt that the German population could always be a reason for their larger neighbor to invade them, so the Germans were expelled. The expulsion was clearly inhumane (apparently more than 3,000,000 were expelled, with as many as 16,000 deaths), as the people were basically forced out of their homes and across the border, never to return. So, that's the end of my interpretation of history. Fee free to correct any of my "facts."
The question I have is: What happened to those folks? There are several parts to that, a few of which are: 1. Did they go to East or West Germany? 2. Were they welcomed where they went-- i.e. was there housing? education? discrimination? jobs? 3. More germane to this discussion--might their descendants experience "alienation and economic marginalization" (JE's words) which might push them toward the AfD?
JE comments: Paul, everything sounds correct to me. Poland's experience was similar to the one you outline here, except entire cities (Breslau, Stettin and others) were "cleansed" of Germans. (Breslau/Wroclaw is a fascinating case, as the city was re-populated by Poles who had been thrown out of Lwow/Lviv. They even re-settled their works of art: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rac%C5%82awice_Panorama )
The expelled Germans did not have an easy go of it, and many died. It's safe to say that few were welcomed in their new homes. Several WAISers could definitely give us more details.
Fate of Sudeten Germans after WWII
(Nigel Jones, UK
01/17/19 4:24 AM)
Paul Pitlick's post on the history of the Sudeten Germans (January 16th) is completely correct, except that his figure of 16,000 deaths during their forced expulsion after 1945 is probably too low.
According to my friend the historian Giles MacDonogh's 2007 book After the Reich, a quarter of a million Sudeten Germans died. That figure may be too high, but it is beyond doubt that a high proportion of the three million Sudeten Germans perished, along with their ethnic German compatriots expelled from Poland, the Baltic states, Silesia and Rumania. MacDonogh claims the total death toll to be three million.
While these are shocking figures, it should be remembered that after the bestialities of the Nazis during WWII in eastern Europe, a sort of rough justice revenge was inevitable and fell on communities who may have been individually innocent, but who did collectively mainly support Hitler's Reich.
Regarding the Sudeten Germans specifically, as Paul says, they composed the second largest ethnic group in the newly created state of Czechoslovakia in 1919 after the Czechs themselves. There were three million of them, or around 18% of the total national population. They were largely clustered in an arc around the western frontiers of the state, mainly in rural villages, but including such cities as Eger and Marienbad. There was also a sizeable German population in the capital Prague.
It is important to remember that the Sudetens had never been part of Germany, but until 1918 had been subjects of the Austro-Hungarian empire. In the 1920s they formed their own political parties, Social Democrats and Nationalist, advocating greater autonomy within Czechoslovakia.
With the rise to power of Hitler's Nazis in neighbouring Germany, the Sudeten National party became more and more extreme. Led by Konrad Henlein and the fanatical Karl Frank, they were soon acting under Hitler's direct orders, and making ever more extreme demands that they knew the Czechs could never accept.
Hitler had a special animus against the Czechs arising from his own childhood in Austria, when his schools were split between ethnic Austrian Germans and Czechs. His deliberate ramping up of largely fictitious Sudeten grievances led to the crisis in autumn 1938 which culminated in the Munich conference, the ceding of the Sudetenland to his Reich, and six months later to the forced Nazi occupation of the ethnically Czech lands of Bohemia and Moravia and the creation of a puppet Slovak state under the Nazi Catholic priest Joseph Tiso.
The Nazi occupation of the Czech lands was brutal in the extreme, and Henlein and Frank were among the SS officials who enforced it. The most notorious episode followed the assassination in Prague of the ruthless Reinhard Heydrich, "Protector" of Bohemia and Moravia, in 1942 by Czech and Slovak agents trained and parachuted in by Britain. As is well known, the village of Lidice (falsely suspected of harbouring the assassins) was literally wiped from the face of the earth by the SS in revenge. Of the 340 villagers, all the men were shot, while the women and children were sent to concentration camps. Only 153 women and 17 children survived the war. Hitler had originally demanded that 30,000 Czechs be exterminated, but this figure was reduced when it was pointed out to him that it would adversely affect Czech industrial production for the Reich. Nevertheless, up to 2,000 Czechs were executed in reprisal for Heydrich's death alone.
Revenge after the war was only to be expected. The Czech pre-war President, Edvard Benes, returning from exile in Britain, ordered the total expulsion of the Sudeten Germans. Upwards of two and a half million of them were expelled to West Germany, where they chiefly settled in Bavaria. For many years their associations were a significant force in German politics, demanding a return to their homes and/or compensation, but as they became absorbed in the general German population these demands dwindled.
The Sudeten villages remained largely empty into the 1960s until they were repopulated by the Czechs. I am unaware of whether there are current moves afoot for any return of the Sudetens' descendants to their ancestral homes .
Of the two original Nazi Sudeten leaders, Henlein committed suicide in an Allied Internment camp, while Frank was publicly executed in Prague. There is a gruesome film of his hanging on YouTube. It was well deserved.
I append a link to a review I wrote of After the Reich. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/3664526/How-three-million-Germans-died-after-VE-Day.html
JE comments: Excellent overview, Nigel; thanks. You sum up the situation perfectly in your MacDonogh review: "This unhappy story has long been cloaked in silence since telling it suited no one." The suffering of millions of Germans after the war is a profound case study into collective guilt. Is it ever justifiable to punish the many for the crimes of the few? Time and again, history gives its sad answer: yes.
Do the Resettled Germans Support AfD? "Game of Bones"
(Paul Pitlick, USA
01/30/19 2:51 PM)
Thanks to Nigel Jones and Eugenio Battaglia (17 January), as well as to JE for their responses to my post of the 16th regarding the resettlement of people of German origin who were "repatriated" into Germany after WWII--a reminder that there were many other countries besides Czechoslovakia who did that.
The only article I found (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/11/germans-and-czechs-mass-expulsion-trying-to-deal-with-ghosts-of-the-past ) cited a death toll of 16,000, but it certainly could have been higher. As I understand Nigel, the transition into Germany was not exactly smooth, but as he stated, "as they became absorbed in the general German population these demands dwindled."
My real question (the bit about the resettlements was just preamble) was whether it's known if the children and grandchildren of the resettled people are disproportionately represented in today's AfD party. Is this part of the discontent which apparently is fueling the AfD fire?
One would have hoped (at least I do) that if humans are supposed to be rational, we would somehow have been able to develop mechanisms to work with displaced peoples, since we have been doing this to each other for thousands of years. Indeed, Jordi Molins (21 January) quoted a study that "Every man in Spain was wiped out 4500 years ago by hostile invaders," but I was unable to open more than an introductory paragraph of this article.
However, it turns out that the NY Times had published a more general version of this topic in its Magazine (20 January--"Game of Bones"). This article also highlights the work of David Reich, who was featured in the article Jordi cited.
For those who are interested in how modern DNA analysis is shaping the thinking of some evolutionary biologists, I would highly recommend it (a major focus of this article is the island Vanuatu in the South Pacific, but there is reference to the events in Spain 4500 years ago). I believe the article is also protected behind a firewall, although I believe that you can access 10 articles/month:
JE comments: I've used up my NYT quota, but other WAISers may be able to get access at this link. It's hard to believe that invaders could liquidate an entire male population, even given the tiny numbers of six millennia ago.
I second Paul Pitlick's question about the AfD "base." I understand for starters that many supporters are from the former DDR. What else do we know?
Sudeten Germans; Who Suports the AfD?
(Nigel Jones, UK
01/31/19 1:06 PM)
Since Paul Pitlick's original question about the Sudeten Germans, I have done a bit of research around the question.
Although it seems unquestionable that the "Benes decrees" (the legal umbrella under which the Sudetens were expelled in 1945-46) were illegal under UN human rights principles, the pragmatic decision seems to have been taken by post-war West Germany, not to pursue claims for restitution, still less for resettlement of the Sudetens in their original homes. Obviously this was because of the Germans' own monstrous war crimes, not least in Czechoslovakia. No one wished to reopen that can of worms while memories were still raw.
Since German reunification and the subsequent growth of German economic and political power, the sleeping Sudeten dogs have been still left to lie. The emphasis now is on reconciliation, and there have been a few individual instances of some Sudetens visiting their ancestral villages and meeting the new Czech owners in apparent amity. A stark contrast to, say, Israel/Palestine where a similar mass population transfer took place at around the same time.
As to Paul's question on whether old Sudeten discontent contributed to the rise of the AfD, don't think so. Although the AfD increased support even in prosperous Bavaria, where most Sudetens settled, in the recent local Land elections there, as John Eipper wrote, the AfD is strongest in former East Germany, which has remained relatively poor and deprived since unification.
The rise of the AfD, as with other populist parties elsewhere in Europe, has far more to do with a massive protest by those left behind by globalisation and threatened by a mass immigration invasion promoted by the corporate interests who run all our lives.
JE comments: Thanks, Nigel. Speaking of anti-globalization, who can tell us the latest from France and Yellow Vests?
- Should Germany Build the Bomb? (Eugenio Battaglia, Italy 02/03/19 4:33 AM)
In response to Paul Pitlick, 31 January, I believe that the German AFD is not supported mostly by the German refugees or better their heirs from the Sudetenland and other parts of Eastern Europe.
By the way, ethnic Germans from Alto Adige/Sud Tyrol in Italy who in 1939 chose to emigrate to the Third Reich, screaming "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Furher," chose to return to Italy in 1945, where the living conditions were better at the time. They were welcomed by Italy even if they had created some problems.
Most of the refugees ended up in West Germany, especially Bavaria, and not in East Germany. After having experienced the millions of killings and rapes by the Soviets, who would not have done his or her best to avoid living under Soviet rule?
The main reason why the AFD is stronger in the East is because the people under the Russian control maintained their German soul while West Germany became, maybe thanks to the ill-famed "reeducation treatment," a good colony of the Empire. Presently Germany is an occupied colony but in exchange it has the opportunity to get rich and create its small economic empire in Europe. But such a small empire is only an economic one, as the German Armed Forces are probably the least efficient in all Europe.
At present only 39 Eurofighter airplanes out of 128 can operate, only 105 Leopard 2 tanks out of 224 can move, and of its 6 submarines, none are in condition to go to sea. Maybe this is a different way to react to its colonial status, and the old German spirit may jump out if the opportunity arises.
In addition to the above, the former East Germans harbor some resentments, as they have been more or less considered second-class citizens by the West German establishment.
A curiosity: when the DDR collapsed, the former good communist Angela Merkel at first tried to enter the Socialist Party, but as there were not good career possibilities, she joined the Christian Democrat Party and found much success.
A final note. As early as 1956 Adenaeur said the Bundeswehr needed a nuclear bomb. The 1954 Treaty of Paris, in which West Germany agreed not to pursue nuclear weapons could have been bypassed by building them in France but then De Gaulle wanted their "force de frappe" only for France. Adenauer called the Non-Proliferation Treaty worse than the Morgenthau plan, while Straus called it a new Versailles of cosmic proportions. Now Christian Hacke is openly asking for Germany to get nuclear weapons. See The National Interest (August 2018), "Why Germany should get the Bomb."
JE comments: The National Interest piece is linked below. In a nutshell, author Christian Hacke argues that Germany can no longer rely on Trump's America or even NATO for defense, and Germany can be taken seriously only if it joins the Nuclear Club. Hacke terms this "hard military power." But defense against who? Russia?
- Post Unpublished - please check back later
- Sudeten Germans and Other Displaced Nationalities of WWII (Eugenio Battaglia, Italy 01/19/19 4:18 AM)
Very good post from Paul Pitlick, 16 January, and very good comments from JE. However a few observations can be made.
As the great multi-ethnic empires failed in the early 20th century, the criminal victors created smaller multi-ethnic empires such as Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, Poland and in a certain way Italy too, as some territories inhabited by Italians were not given to Italy while some territories inhabited by Germans and Slavs were annexed to the Italian state.
The victors of WWII, being even more criminal, did not create small ethnic empires but embarked on a horrible ethnic cleansing with millions of displaced or killed Germans, Poles, Italians, and Hungarians, plus all those from the enlarged USSR, including from the tiny Italian minority in Crimea.
Probably it was a greater tragedy than the Holocaust itself, but it is taboo to talk about this.
It is noteworthy to remember the first criminal who wanted ethnic cleansing: Franz Josef of Austria, who on 12 November 1866 ordered energetic action against the Italians of Trentino-Alto Adige/Sud Tyrol, Trieste, Istria and Dalmatia, pushing them out and proceeding with the Germanization or Slavization of these areas.
In Czechoslovakia the Czechs numbered about 7 million. They were democratic for themselves, but at the same time they were oppressors of the Germans, Slovaks, Poles, Ruthenians and Hungarians.
The 1938 Munich Accords brought the liberation of the Germans of the Sudetenland, the Poles of Teschen and the Hungarians of South Teschen. The last two groups are never remembered.
Then on 15 March 1939 the Slovaks proclaimed independence followed by the Ruthenians, who however were annexed to Hungary. At the same time the cowardly Czech President Emil Hacha asked for the protection of the Third Reich, becoming the chief of an autonomous Protectorate within the Third Reich. Therefore except for the last two episodes of Ruthenia and the Protectorate, everything went according the wishes of the concerned peoples, no matter what may be said now.
Regarding the refugees in their new areas, they always had difficult conditions. Let us not forget about the peoples in the newly enlarged USSR, who ended up in Kazakhstan or Siberia. As for the Italians, those who were expelled or escaped from Dalmatia, Fiume and Istria were not welcomed, and many ended up in former concentration camps. I just want to mention the "Shame Train" at Bologna station of 18 February 1947. A train full of refugees from Pola was directed to Ancona, but at the Bologna station the Communists organized a strike to stop it, threw stones at the refugees while the food and milk for the children prepared by the Red Cross was denied to them and thrown on the tracks.
In 2007, "only" 60 years later, a politically correct but nonetheless significant plaque was placed by the Municipality and the Association of Refugees.
JE comments: This week we've been discussing "received wisdom." Eugenio Battaglia rarely fails to challenge our assumptions and expectations for European history.
It's hard for me to conceive of liberation by Nazi Germany, instead of liberation from it. Did the Sudeten Germans think differently? I wonder how many of them regretted being absorbed by Germany, when they had previously lived in an ethnically divided but liberal democracy. By 1945, probably all of them did (regret it).
Eugenio, what motivated the Communists to attack a refugee train? Sheer hooliganism?
- Should Germany Build the Bomb? (Eugenio Battaglia, Italy 02/03/19 4:33 AM)
- Sudeten Germans; Who Suports the AfD? (Nigel Jones, UK 01/31/19 1:06 PM)
- Do the Resettled Germans Support AfD? "Game of Bones" (Paul Pitlick, USA 01/30/19 2:51 PM)
- Fate of Sudeten Germans after WWII (Nigel Jones, UK 01/17/19 4:24 AM)