Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

PAX, LUX ET VERITAS SINCE 1965
Post Trump in Trouble
Created by John Eipper on 12/15/18 4:21 PM

Previous posts in this discussion:

Post

Trump in Trouble (Cameron Sawyer, Russia, 12/15/18 4:21 pm)

More and more evidence of serious crimes committed by the US President, provided by an increasing number of witnesses who were formerly close to the President, including most strikingly the President's personal lawyer, increase the prospect of a successful impeachment.

There are two good articles about it in the current electronic issue of the National Review:

David French, "Republicans Don't Fool Yourselves:  Donald Trump is in Serious Trouble":

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/12/republicans-dont-fool-yourselves-donald-trump-is-in-serious-trouble/

And one by my friend Mona Charen, "The Collusion Scenario":

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/12/the-collusion-scenario/

This is what we get, when we elect someone to high office without due regard to the question of character. We made this mistake once before, with Bill Clinton. But it is impossible to imagine such goings on with a man like Barack Obama or either of the Bushes, or for that matter with Carter or Reagan. Bill Clinton was accustomed to the banana republic rules of the State of Arkansas--a powerful man could have sex with anyone he wanted without consequences, even without their consent; could take bribes, could sell influence, whatever. Donald Trump is a brash and arrogant TV reality show star (never and in no way an actual businessman), accustomed to behaving in any way his extremely arrogant and narcissistic impulses took him ("Grab ‘em by the pussy; do anything you want with them" [when you're a star]). He could get away with it when it was "only television," but the presidency is not a reality TV show, with no one around but fans and mercenary TV execs--Washington is full of proud, powerful people not willing to kowtow to this kind of arrogance, and not willing to overlook this kind of behaviour, particularly when there's nothing in it for them.

Trump has not been the worst president we've ever had--among the boneheaded trade wars and reckless tweet storms, he's done a few very good things--on taxes, on judicial appointments, to name two. Despite numerous irresponsible tweet-storms directed at foreign governments, he hasn't started any new wars and hasn't escalated any existing ones. But Republicans have made a deal with the devil by putting up with what they put up with, for the sake of these achievements. It's all now likely to blow up in their faces. And if Trump is successfully impeached, the consequences will be profound. Trump's hard-core "deplorables" supporters will see an establishment conspiracy behind it, sharply increasing their alienation, and greatly increasing the risk of social turmoil, something we need least of all right now. The vacuum left when he goes down might be filled by God knows what.

Bill Clinton got away with, to some extent, severe lapses of behaviour, crimes, and lies--because he was an actual politician, with an actual political network of real supporters, whose interests Clinton knew on an individual basis, and considered, and catered to, and because he possessed no small amount of charm and persuasiveness. Trump has none of these advantages. The affected scowl on his face really says it all--he is unable to relate to anyone except as the star of his own show, where everyone can be hired and fired at will, and the presidency doesn't work like that--the president needs the support of a whole constellation of people in order to do his job, or to even keep it.

I'm afraid it's a dark day for our political system. But dark day or not--it would be worse if Trump were allowed to get away with it. Let the chips fall where they may, I say.

JE comments:  The chips are turning into an avalanche.  Trump will be forced into full defense mode, which does not bode well for his (already questionable) ability to govern.

And if I may pry, Cameron, how do you know Mona Charen?

(WAIS is turning into a nocturnal on-line Forum, I fear, at least until December 20th.  The wi-fi in Cuba works better after dark.  To be more precise, it actually works after dark.)


SHARE:
Rate this post
Informational value 
Insight 
Fairness 
Reader Ratings (1)
20%
Informational value20%
Insight20%
Fairness20%

Visits: 163

Comments/Replies

Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now



All Forums with Published Content (41977 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications

Economics

Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy

Education

Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series

History

Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust

Nations

Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire

Politics

Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 Violence War War Crimes Within the US

Religion

Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)

Travel

Geography Maps Tourism Transportation

WAIS

1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who