Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

PAX, LUX ET VERITAS SINCE 1965
Post China's Military and Cyber Threat to the US
Created by John Eipper on 11/19/18 3:07 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:

Post

China's Military and Cyber Threat to the US (Eugenio Battaglia, Italy, 11/19/18 3:07 am)

In the past we have discussed the US Empire, its huge military expenses and its many military bases around the world.

The Empire is a maritime power with its great fleet practically dominating all oceans, except for some contested areas, especially in the western Pacific Ocean, where the US Navy still navigates anyway, claiming freedom of passage.

The only two powers that can oppose the Empire are Russia and China. Both claim great military progress in the development of new tanks, submarines and various types of missiles, including those that are claimed to be able to reduce aircraft carriers to sitting ducks.

But if a state wants to maintain its empire, all this weaponry is useless unless it can dominate also the Web.

Both Russia and China have made great steps in this field, especially China. On 9 June 2014, Xi Jinping in a speech to scientists and engineers called for a complete dominance of modern technologies by all means.

The difference between the US and China is that in the former the great tech companies GAFA (Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon) may cooperate with the military, while in the latter BAT (Baida, Ali Baba and Tencent) are obligated to cooperate with the military. This can be a big advantage for China.

The "cuckoo" policy is widespread. It is when a foreign company joins with a domestic company not for a natural commercial partnership but for stealing its technology.

We have experienced the cuckoo trick in Italy for a long time. A foreign company (especially at a time of crisis when prices drop) buys some valuable Italian firms enjoying the initial financial support of the Italian state. Then after few years when all the technology is acquired the plant is closed, the employees are fired and the production is transferred home or to another country with a cheaper work force. The new government in Rome has just enacted a law by which if a company receives financial concessions it cannot later relocate.

Any means is valid (it is the "market"). Bloomberg has also reported that some parts sold by the Chinese firms to Apple, Amazon, Cia and the Pentagon contain small chips used to spy for China. Of course Apple and Amazon have denied this, but it sounds very realistic.

To be honest, all the fuss about the US-China commercial war is probably due to the fact that Trump has recognized the Chinese danger. See the recent blocking of the Chinese in Broadcom and Lattice Semiconductor.  Stephen Bryan was aware of this problem as early as 1979, but the culprit then was Japan.

About security from hackers, if I am not wrong Trump once said that if you want to send a secret message you should write it on a piece of paper and then send it by trusted person.

About the stupidity of EU Commission it has been reported, that following the UN it wants to declare prosciutto, parmesan cheese and olive oil as dangerous to the health.

This idea is coming from some foreign states, and it seems to be due to the presence of salt in the preparation of the cheese and prosciutto. For the oil I could not find the reason.

One other attack would be the permission to no longer indicate the origin of products such as wine. It is believed to be a political and economic attack by the countries with large junk food and drink industries.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/07/19/agriculture-minister-says-italian-ham-parmesan-attack-un-plan/

JE comments:  According to the Telegraph article above, the UN mentioned no specific foods in its report on the dangers of too much salt.  An Italian newspaper picked up on this, and caused an outcry by suggesting prosciutto and parmesan might be under attack--because they are salty.  As for olive oil, this it goodness in liquid form, so I don't know what the problem could be.

A question on military hardware--is there truth to the rumor that the Chinese now have a missile that can easily sink an aircraft carrier?  Or not so easily?  Either way, this would be a game-changer.


SHARE:
Rate this post
Informational value 
Insight 
Fairness 
Reader Ratings (0)
0%
Informational value0%
Insight0%
Fairness0%

Visits: 136

Comments/Replies

Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now



All Forums with Published Content (41968 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications

Economics

Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy

Education

Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series

History

Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust

Nations

Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire

Politics

Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 Violence War War Crimes Within the US

Religion

Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)

Travel

Geography Maps Tourism Transportation

WAIS

1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who