Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

Post Trump's Economics; from Ric Mauricio
Created by John Eipper on 11/19/16 4:09 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:


Trump's Economics; from Ric Mauricio (John Eipper, USA, 11/19/16 4:09 am)

Ric Mauricio writes:

Trump not cashing his presidential salary would not be "smart" tax-wise. You see, the IRS sees the earnings as constructively earned, and therefore he owes taxes on it.

As to the rhetoric that Trump will levy tariffs on China of 45% and on Mexico of 35% would be in violation of law. The law currently limits a maximum tariff of 15%.

As to the infrastructure spending that Trump proposes, unfortunately, the US is a not a big producer of steel that can be utilized for infrastructure projects. The US steel production is geared more towards specialized steel. So where will we get the steel? China?

Same goes for cement. Where do we get enough cement? Mexico?

Trump says we all know where the dollar is going, which implies that the dollar is depreciating. However, I contend that a depreciating dollar and copious issuing of government debt is genius, but nefarious. You see, if you give me a dollar and I give you a piece of paper in return indicating that I will pay back some interest (in this low interest environment, that is virtually nothing) plus the dollar in the future, but I print more dollars thus depreciating the dollar's value, then I will be paying you in dollars that are worth less than the dollar you initially gave me. This is brilliant.

Unfortunately, the biggest holder of this government debt are the American people, mostly through government programs such as Social Security and Medicare. And the Chinese are slowly figuring this out themselves, issuing their own government obligations and depreciating the Chinese yuan at an even faster rate than the US is depreciating its dollar. And they are cashing in American treasuries and buying American real estate. Oh, they have figured this out, haven't they?

With Trump's advisor choices of Bannon, Flynn, and Sessions, I am now questioning my perhaps naive and optimistic comparison to Winston Churchill.

Perhaps we will bow down to the Emperor Trump or kiss the ring of His Holiness Donald I.

JE comments:  An editorial curiosity:  will the term "Trumponomics" catch on?  Probably, although it's still unclear what Trumponomics really are--a murky branch of the Dismal Science.  A Googling reveals 315,000 hits and growing, including references in the mainstream media (among others, CNN, The New Yorker, and the WSJ).

Rate this post
Informational value 
Reader Ratings (1)
Informational value100%

Visits: 90


Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now

All Forums with Published Content (45708 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications


Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy


Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series


Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust


Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire


Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 Violence War War Crimes Within the US


Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)


Geography Maps Tourism Transportation


1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who