Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

PAX, LUX ET VERITAS SINCE 1965
Post Justice Scalia and Dow Chemical
Created by John Eipper on 03/01/16 5:13 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:

Post

Justice Scalia and Dow Chemical (Tor Guimaraes, USA, 03/01/16 5:13 am)

In recent days we were debating Antonin Scalia's nature as a human being and US citizen. I was suspicious of him because of the Citizens United case. Some more negative evidence about his character is trickling in after his death under interesting circumstances.

Some media outlets not yet purchased by big money are reporting the following:

Dow Chemical Co. has been accused of conspiring to fix prices for some chemicals and a jury found that they did. The Court entered Final Judgment against Dow for the amount of $1,060,847,117.00, plus interest.

Needless to say, Dow appealed the verdict and the judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, lost on the appeal and the Court denied Dow's request for a rehearing.

On March 9, 2015, Dow filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States, seeking further review of the verdict and judgment. The case was expected to be heard in late 2015 or in the first half of 2016.

Suddenly, however, Dow decided to pay $835 million to settle the antitrust case pending before the US Supreme Court after Justice Antonin Scalia's death, which sources believe reduced the chances of overturning the jury award.

Erik Gordon, a professor at the University of Michigan's business and law schools, stated, "Companies whose positions are based more on political philosophy than on interpretation of the law worry when the majority philosophy in sway at the court changes. ... It is unlikely that any nominee will be as favorable to business as Justice Scalia was."

Whatever happened to free-market capitalism that we used to be so proud of? This seems more like Capitalism by market and government manipulation and as I suspected,

Scalia seems to have been part of the problem.

JE comments:  See this piece from the Alternet website:

http://www.alternet.org/labor/dow-chemical-would-rather-pay-835-million-take-its-chances-scalia-less-supreme-court

Dow (a Michigan company) was found guilty of fixing the prices on a urethane compound used in foam upholstery.  Does this mean that everyone who's purchased a couch recently will get a cut?

Scalia was notoriously unsympathetic about consumer class-action lawsuits.

On a related Supreme Court note, Justice Clarence Thomas, for the first time in ten years, asked a question during a hearing yesterday.  Is Thomas seeking to take over the Scalia mantle?


SHARE:
Rate this post
Informational value 
Insight 
Fairness 
Reader Ratings (1)
93%
Informational value80%
Insight100%
Fairness100%

Visits: 137

Comments/Replies

Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

  • Antitrust Settlements (David Duggan, USA 03/01/16 2:26 PM)

    To have standing under the antitrust laws, you have to have purchased from the price-fixer, not some middle-person (i.e., the manufacturer of the product containing the price-fixed component) between the price-fixer and the consumer. See Illinois Brick.


    JE comments:  I was kind of joking about my couch, although I did buy one a few months ago, and wouldn't mind a nice check from Dow.


    This means, I presume, that the majority of the Dow $800+ million will go to other corporations--furniture and automotive seating companies, for example.


    Please login/register to reply or comment:


  • Justice Scalia and Big Business: New Yorker (Paul Levine, Denmark 03/03/16 4:35 AM)

    In connection with Antonin Scalia's death, this article from the New Yorker casts light on the real consequences of the Supreme Court Judge's legal philosophy:


    http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/03/07/antonin-scalias-corporate-influence



    JE comments:  Author James Surowiecki contends that Scalia's death will have little impact on the "culture wars" (same-sex marriage and abortion), given that he was already in the minority on these issues.  The biggest shift will be for big business:  Scalia was reliably on the side of the large corporations in matters such as consumer litigation and class-action suits.  Scalia's passing, according to Surowiecki, means the Little Guy will have a better chance to have his/her day in court.


    Meanwhile, that paragon of investigative journalism, the National Enquirer, leads its March 7th issue with the headline "Scalia Was Murdered"!  The bullet points:  1)  Why DNA was destroyed & there was no autopsy; 2) Why body was found with pillow over head; 3) Why he was staying next to a brothel; 4) Why his bodyguard disappeared.


    Confession:  WAIS HQ subscribes to the Enquirer.  Enquiring minds want to know.  If time allows, I'll read the full story today.

    Please login/register to reply or comment:


Trending Now



All Forums with Published Content (41958 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications

Economics

Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy

Education

Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series

History

Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust

Nations

Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire

Politics

Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 Violence War War Crimes Within the US

Religion

Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)

Travel

Geography Maps Tourism Transportation

WAIS

1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who